It's shocking … but true!
Someone once said, "I know that half my advertising dollars are wasted, I just don't know which half." When you acquire donors through traditional media like direct mail or radio, 99% of those receiving your message don't respond!
When you send an appeal to your own donors, 95% don't respond.
You're mailing all your appeals and newsletters to many donors who only give in December! This only irritates them.
You're mailing appeals to people who give every month through their receipt and don't need those appeals. These are some of your most committed donors.
Waste! Waste!! Waste!!!
The good news is there is something you can do today that will help you stop wasting money. While the solution doesn't fix 100% of the problem, it can get you a long way down the road to saving money right away.
Leaders in Christian ministries strive to be good stewards of the resources with which God has entrusted them and to achieve the greatest Kingdom impact possible. No one intentionally sets out to waste precious organizational resources.
Sadly, many Christian ministries are wasting money under the false assumption that they are employing every technology and strategy to create maximum net income.
Think about it. For 30 or more years, direct marketers in the Christian nonprofit arena have relied on Recency, Frequency and Monetary amount (RFM) to segment their donor files and to achieve cost-effective mailing strategies. For mailing purposes, donors were put in segments based on their date of last gift, their last or largest gift amount, and the frequency of their giving.
This approach to segmentation has been a very effective tool for maximizing income for ministries. However, there are numerous other variables that affect giving. Some examples include:
Up until the last few years there has not been an effective methodology to get at these and many other variables and giving patterns. Enter "data mining."
Data mining is an analytical method that looks for patterns in donor giving, creates predictive models, and results in more sophisticated ways of segmenting the donor file for mailing. Typical "bottom line" results are:
The examples below are just the "tip of the iceberg" in terms of donor giving patterns to consider.
Of course, you could keep doing things the way you've done them for years. The result? Waste, waste, and more waste.